New fees for tribunals from 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
3 October 2011 Last updated at 14:33 GMT Employees will have to work for longer before being able to go to a tribunal A fee for bringing an employment tribunal will be charged for the first time from April 2013, Chancellor George Osborne has announced.

There will be a refund for any individual who wins their case.

The amount that will be charged and how it should be paid will be subject to consultation starting by the end of November.

There is currently no fee for an applicant who wants to make an employment tribunal claim.

The low-paid, or those without an income, may also have the fee waived or reduced at the start of the process, under the new scheme.

"We are ending the one way bet against small businesses," Mr Osborne told the Conservative conference in Manchester.

Timescale

The chancellor also confirmed that, from April 2011, the qualifying period for a claim for unfair dismissal will be that the individual must have been in the job for at least two years.

At present they only need to have been working for one year.

"We respect the right of those who spent their whole lives building up a business, not to see that achievement destroyed by a vexatious appeal to an employment tribunal. So we are now going to make it much less risky for businesses to hire people," Mr Osborne said.

Last year there were 236,000 employment tribunal claims - of which only some were unfair dismissal claims, with an average award for successful complainants of ￡8,900.

Under Mr Osborne's plan, workers will still be able to take action immediately if they suffer discrimination, but by reducing the risk of tribunals for unfair dismissals the government hopes bosses will feel more confident about hiring people.

The GMB union has criticised the plan.

"The very notion that reducing the rights of workers of between 12 months and two years service to bring unfair dismissal claims will create a single new job is quire frankly absurd. Job creation is not the real reason the Tory party want to take away these rights," said Paul Kenny, general secretary of the GMB.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said the move was a "charter for bad bosses".

Abandoned

However, business lobby the CBI, welcomed it.

"We have been urging the government to do everything it can to make it easier for firms to grow and create jobs, and this will give employers, especially smaller ones, more confidence to hire," said director general John Cridland.

In 2010-11 the cost to the taxpayer of running employment tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal in England, Wales and Scotland was more than ￡84m, according to the Ministry of Justice.

The Treasury said that more than 80% of applications made to an employment tribunal did not result in a full hearing.

Almost 40% of applicants withdrew their cases, but employers still had to pay legal fees in preparing a defence. More than 40% settled out of court and there was no record of how much applicants settled for, it added.

Martin Edwards, employment law expert at law firm Weightmans, said: "The changes may have mixed results. Someone who has not worked long enough to claim unfair dismissal may claim they are a whistleblower or a victim of discriminaiton instead, causing employers even more hassle than before.

"But people who have to pay to bring a claim may regard that as a significant disincentive to litigating a dispute."

View the original article here

VIDEO: Youth unemployment rise in Eurozone

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
4 October 2011 Last updated at 21:07 GMT Help

View the original article here

Survey finds 28p beer price gap

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
5 October 2011 Last updated at 23:08 GMT Even the cheapest pint of bitter in London costs more than ￡3, the survey says The cheapest pint of beer is 28p cheaper in pubs in the north of England compared with south-eastern hostelries, a survey suggests.

Some 650 pubs were asked for the cost of their cheapest pint of bitter by researchers for the Good Pub Guide.

They found that this pint cost ￡3.15 on average in the south-east of England and London, but ￡2.87 in Yorkshire and the North.

Campaigners say that overheads faced by pubs could explain the difference.

Rates and rents were often higher for London publicans and that could be reflected in the cost of a drink, said Tony Jerome, spokesman for the Campaign for Real Ale (Camra).

Brewers

The 30th edition of the Good Pub Guide, published on Thursday, found that prices had risen by 7% over the last year - and that the north-south price divide had been in evidence for some time.

However, it suggested that pubs brewing their own ale were often charging less than ￡2.50 a pint, with scarcely any increase over the last year. A recent Camra survey claimed West Yorkshire had more breweries producing more types of beer than any other county in the UK.

Figures from the British Beer and Pub Association's Statistical Handbook claimed that the price differential for a pint in London and in the North East in 2010 was even greater - at 84p.

One brewer warned that the price of a pint could continue to rise

Paul Maloney, national officer of the GMB union, said: "Since the Good Pub Guide was first published, the Beer Orders were introduced in 1989. The aim was to foster competition to increase consumer choice and bring down prices.

"The opposite of this aim has been achieved. The average price for a pint of lager in Britain has risen by 80p higher than justified by inflation and changes in taxes in pubs, as property companies replaced brewers as owners."

Rising costs

Brewer Shepherd Neame said on Wednesday that beer prices would continue to rise in the coming months.

The brewer, which produces real ales such as Spitfire and Bishops Finger, said cereals such as barley were up to 30% more expensive than a year ago, while the price of glass has also increased, pushing up the cost of beer bottles and pint jars.

However, changes to the tax system have made some drinks cheaper.

Since 1 October, all beers with an alcohol content of 2.8% abv and below are being taxed less, to the equivalent of around 35p on every pint when compared with a typical 4.2% cent beer.

The Good Pub Guide also suggested that steak-in-ale pie was the most popular pub food.

Editor Fiona Stapley said that many pubs were diversifying, such as offering breakfasts and coffee mornings, to get through tough economic conditions.

View the original article here

Guinea PM defends mining shake-up

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
14 September 2011 Last updated at 13:01 GMT Guinea is the world's main exporter of bauxite Guinea's new mining code will curb corruption and make more money available for development, Prime Minister Mohamed Said Fofana has said.

The code gives the government a free 15% share in mining companies and demands greater financial transparency.

Several foreign firms have warned that the code, which came into law over the weekend, will deter investors.

Guinea, despite being the world's main exporter of the aluminium ore bauxite, is one of Africa's poorest countries.

A democratic government was elected in December, ending the authoritarian and military rule that had blighted the country since independence in 1958.

In an address on national TV, Mr Fofana said the government would hold investors accountable and ensure they paid taxes and royalties.

Foreign companies would have to invest a minimum of $1bn (￡633m), he said.

'God-given riches'

The BBC's Alhassan Sillah in the capital, Conakry, says this is intended to prevent companies bribing officials in exchange for cheap mining rights.

Continue reading the main story

"[The] mining code adopted in Guinea increases considerably tax pressure on mining companies, making it senseless to invest in development and new projects”

End Quote United Co Rusal Previous mining contracts would be reviewed to ensure there were no irregularities, our reporter says.

On Monday, Mines Minister Mohamed Lamine Fofana told Reuters news agency that the government had overturned an agreement by the ex-military junta to give secretive investment group China International Fund the rights to all of Guinea's unexploited resources.

The new code guarantees the government a minimum stake of 15% in companies and the option of buying a further 20%, Reuters says.

It also requires companies to carry out environmental and social impact studies before they are granted mining permits, the agency says.

The prime minister said this would prevent environmental degradation, making sure that communities living near mines did not suffer.

Our reporter says most Guineans have welcomed the mining code, hoping that they will finally benefit from the country's "god-given riches".

But it has been opposed by several big companies operating in Guinea, including Moscow-based aluminium company United Co Rusal, which said it would not make further investments in Guinea.

"[The] mining code adopted in Guinea increases considerably tax pressure on mining companies, making it senseless to invest in development and new projects," it said in a statement to Bloomberg news agency.

Another major investor in Guinea, Australia's Rio Tinto, also expressed concern about the code, saying it would cost the company an extra $10bn, the Christian Science Monitor news website reports.

Our correspondent says the government is unlikely to bow to business pressure because mining sector reforms was a key promise to voters in the build-up to December's elections.

The government took over from the military junta that had seized power in December 2008 on the death of the previous President, Lansana Conte, who had ruled for 24 years.

Guinea holds half of the world's bauxite reserves, as well as large deposits of gold and diamonds.

However, most of its citizens live on less than $1 a day.

View the original article here

Olympic deals the company ' unsold '

October 6, 2011, last updated at 08: 37 GMT by Michael Hirst BBC 2012 almost two-thirds of the packages website for London 2012 can still sell companiesWith 300 days to go before London 2012, only a third of the tickets were sold on the site hosting the games.

But despite the financial downturn, the company with exclusive rights within Olympic venues hosting company remains bullish about the sales.

Ticketing prestige won a public tender by computerized Olympic Locog some 90,000 tickets-about one percent of the total allocation.

The British public must buy most tickets 6.6 m available by ballot.

However, more than 60% of the company's operations are still on offer.

The company did not disclose how much it paid for the tickets, nor the expected profit, citing commercially sensitive information.

And, like the London 2012 Olympics will be the first site hosting company, you can't compare the figures with previous games.

Redgrave Steve Sir said hosting VIP Olympics figaro behind other sporting events

But involved in the industry told the BBC that they would expect much more dimensional ratio of the packages were sold after almost 7 months of sales.

In a public ballot tickets acted outside his powers or more earlier this year, top-tier in any Olympic ceremonies tickets cost ￡ 2,012, with the best seats going for ￡ 750 Athletics events.

The cheapest cards cost ￡ 495 's luxury deals, while the most expensive suites ￡ 4,500 seats sold in batches of 10 or more secure ceremonies and athletics and cycling finals.

Events sell out

Corporate guests are the guests on the site can view:

"The best seats in the House of champagne lunch" Olympic events receptionFour-course canapé with as many "best of British" food and wines, Travelcards London transport, although hundreds of parking spaces will also be available

Olympic Park, the ticket is ￡ 7 luxury building. Pavilion three-story 5 m catering 3,000 guests at a time, only 70 metres (77 metres) from the main stadium.

Read on the Central story of 70 m (75 feet) from the Olympic Stadium cost ￡ 7. 5 m three-storey Pavilion with a massive glass atrium six restaurants catering for dinersIn 3,000 only 29 days before being placed in any well demolishedHospitality halls and Greenwich Park, North Greenwich arena, horses, dornei Eaton Wimbledon.

The economic depression to traditional customers in economics, he joined advertising by companies in areas like construction, energy resources, the company said.

While the company packages baoki women's final was the first to sell out, was also a demand for land in Wimbledon, rowing at Eton dornei coltori events in Greenwich, the company said.

Marketing Manager Tony Bernard Ticketing said he was sure that luxury to sell other packages like companies settled their budgets next year.

"We see significant growth in sales," he told the BBC. "Ballots tickets end so that people can know that if they want to go, there is only one way left to go."

Olympic opportunity

Prof Simon Chadwick, Director of Business Center for international sport at the University of Coventry, said that while the economic crisis hit the company's hosting industry in recent years, the exceptional nature of the London 2012 will allow him "above the prevailing economic conditions."

In a study commissioned by the luxury card, Prof Chadwick predicted companies buying hosting packages-with an estimated ￡ 45bn. 1-will return more than 12% on their investment.

But he warned this figure was based on factors such as language produced by the goodwill visit to strengthen business relationships.

Winner of gold medal Olympic champion Steve Redgrave, five-time Lord said London 2012 Olympic Games hosting a unique opportunity to put on a par with that of other international events.

"I've been invited to guest with other sponsors of the Olympic Games [the previous] after I retired, you looked after very well, but not quite as well as some other large sporting events," he said.

Prestige is one of three official providers for hosting packages, but has exclusive rights to the Olympics place for guests.

Thomas Cook paid by Locog over ￡ 20 m 200,000 tickets sold as part of the exclusive travel and accommodation packages, while sport Jet was bought 100,000 tickets offered as part of a five star deals for clients abroad.

Locog says revenue tickets will be hosting to give free tickets through a set of cards for the troops, the initiative to get set for school.

View the original article here

Firms vie for UK rescue service

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
5 October 2011 Last updated at 12:06 GMT The successful company would run rescue services out of four bases, including Stornaway At least four companies are competing for a contract to run part of the UK's search and rescue helicopter service.

Firms had until Wednesday to submit bids for a new five-year contract to run four coastguard rescue services in Scotland and southern England.

Bids have been submitted by Bond, Bristow, a consortium including British International Helicopters and CHC, the current coastguard contractors.

The government is to announce which has been successful by the end of the year.

The preferred bidder will take over the operation of helicopter rescue services out of bases in Portland in Dorset, Lee-on-the-Solent in Hampshire, Sumburgh in the Shetland Islands, and Stornoway in the Outer Hebrides from June 2013.

The UK's search and rescue service is currently operated out of four Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) bases, six RAF ones and two Navy ones.

All four coastguard bases are run by CHC, but its contract expires next year.

The Department for Transport needed to find a contractor to run the service after plans for a private consortium to take over all 12 UK helicopter rescue bases were shelved earlier this year.

The Soteria consortium did not get the contract after admitting it had access to commercially sensitive information.

Ministry of Defence police are investigating how the information came to be in the group's possession.

This new contract is expected to plug a gap until a private finance deal is reached for the takeover of the entire search and rescue service.

View the original article here

US factory orders drop slightly

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
4 October 2011 Last updated at 15:08 GMT Activity remained subdued at US factories in the summer New orders at US factories declined slightly, adding to concerns over the health of the world's largest economy.

The Commerce Department said orders for manufactured goods fell 0.2% in August, after rising a downwardly revised 2.1% in July.

Economists had expected orders to be unchanged.

But orders for capital goods - expensive items such as computers and communications equipment - rose 0.9%, the second gain in three months.

Sluggish growth in the US economy earlier this year has not been sufficient to reduce high levels of unemployment.

The economic recovery is "close to faltering", Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said on Tuesday.

On Monday, the ISM Manufacturing Index unexpectedly rose in September, beating expectations that the index would remain unchanged.

View the original article here